Saturday, November 14, 2020

"Oh, You're Such a Good Boy"


The following has been adapted from a soon-to-be published memoir by the same author.


From my earliest recollections, Granny was old. Before moving to a cottage on our property, she lived in an upstairs apartment closer to downtown Mobile, AL in an area called “The Loop” named that because in an earlier day, this was where the streetcar turned around and went back to town. When visiting her I played with her treadle sewing machine—she would disengage the belt that drove the mechanism of the machine and let me pump away—occasionally my toe would find its way between the iron pump-treadle and the floor and I would yell out in pain. 

I would go through the box of buttons of all shapes and sizes that she had in one of the sewing machine drawers. There was a device that looked like a ball on a stick that was used to ‘darn’ socks in the old days. Each Friday, after picking up my brother and me from school, my mother picked up my Granny and took her to buy groceries at the A&P, an event Granny referred to as “Going to the Tea Store” — Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company

I couldn’t imagine anything more exciting to me than Granny moving into a cottage in our yard. Now visits to Granny’s house and listening to her interesting stories would be much more frequent. She had never lived in a rural area and was unaccustomed to the very dark nights and the sounds that went along with living with woods all around. During those early months I often spent the night at her house to keep her company. 

Spending the night with Granny allowed me to see and experience the life and habits of a person who had been born in a previous century. A tiny lady of not more than  five feet tall, she was rugged, in her own way. When roaches appeared — a constant battle in Alabama — she squashed them with her thumb. She told of wringing the necks of chickens and straining milk from a family cow. Everything edible in Granny’s house was kept in the refrigerator to protect it from bugs. Cookies, bread, always cold. A piece of toast had four slabs of hard margarine on the surface. The bread would burn in the oven broiler before the butter would melt. 

Granny’s toes were all bunched up and overlapped each other, something she said was due to wearing shoes that were too small for her as a child. She would laugh as she showed me her toenails, each looking like little hard anthills. One of eight children, her older brothers all succumbed to tuberculosis in middle age. She and two sisters lived into their 90s. 

At night, before bed, Granny would take down the white bun atop her head and braid it into a long queue down her back. Her teeth, which she used only for weddings, funerals, or other auspicious occasions, were kept in a container in the bathroom. She had dropped them and broken them at some point, so when not being worn, they were held together with chewing gum. She would show them to me and we would laugh hysterically. Once her sister borrowed her teeth to wear to a wedding. 

Granny extolled the virtue of believing in God, reading the bible, and attending church, though she only went on special occasions. The reason, she said, was that she was hard-of-hearing. If you took her to church, she would think she was whispering and say something like, “I believe that preacher is the ugliest man I’ve ever seen.”  

A frequent occurrence was for me to bang on Granny’s front door as hard as I could so that she could hear me. I then looked in the window in the door and saw that she jumped and mumbled to herself as she got out of her rocker and made her way to the door. 

She opened the door and began to look for the source of the knock. No one seemed to be there. When she stepped out onto the porch, I would jump up out of the bushes and startle her. She would jump at my sudden appearance and if I was lucky it would cause her to pass gas, audibly. Then, we both would break into laughter and she would begin to hold herself. “Oh, oh, I’m going to wet myself.”  

One Christmas, my cousin Chris got a toy set that enabled you to make rubber bugs. Creepy Crawlers. We would cook up roach-looking rubber bugs and put them on the floor in Granny’s little house. “Look Granny, a roach.” 

“Kill it,” she would say. “Step on it quick.” After we did so, she would go to get the broom to sweep it out the door. After a while she caught on, but we did it again and again. 

She dealt with her hearing deficiency in an amusing manner. Rather than just saying that she didn’t understand something you said, she would instead repeat what it sounded liked to her. 

“We are going to the store,” I might say. “You dropped it on the floor?” she would exclaim. 

"He went to bed" -- “He dropped dead?” she replied. 


“Aunt Cora is coming to stay for a while” Now things would really get interesting. Aunt (we pronounced it Ain’t) Cora was a few years older than Granny. They were both in their eighties by now. Neither had any teeth. Aunt Cora ate baby food, something about her esophagus.

It was hard to believe they grew up in the same home. Granny never used anything close to a bad word. Aunt Cora, on the other hand could use some rather saucy language. I found it to be quite educational. “Don’t say that in front of Brian, Cora” Granny would say. “He’ll tell his daddy.” Granny was always afraid of offending Daddy, fearing (without reason) he wouldn’t allow her to continue to live there. “I don’t give a snap,” was Aunt Cora’s response.  

Aunt Cora was a bigger woman than Granny. Having had nine children, her once ample, ‘bra-less’ breasts now hung low. One day, trying to make me laugh, Aunt Cora grabbed two handfuls of her loose-fitting dress, handfuls which included her breasts and held them up, squeezing them as if milking a cow’s teats. “DON’T DO THAT CORA!” Granny erupted, trembling with anger.

I interacted with Granny almost daily between the ages of 8 and 14. When I returned from school, Granny would ask me to recount what I had learned. She was convinced I was brilliant. I played my trombone for her. "How do you swallow all of that tubing?" she would ask.

*****

1975

Home from college for Christmas break, I went to see Granny, now in a nursing home. I brought her home brought her to my parents’ house for a few hours on Christmas day. Now age 95, she could not walk. I carried her in my arms like a baby. She had always been a small woman and by now I suspected she weighed no more than 60 lbs. In the car during the ride home, I began singing hymns, Rock of AgesThe Old Rugged Cross - she joined in. She didn't say a great deal as she opened her presents, carefully folding the wrapping paper for future use.

*******

“Brian, Call your mother.” The note on my dormitory room door said. It had been only a few weeks since returning to college after the holidays. Each dorm floor had a couple of pay-phones which were in booths near the stairwell. If you happened to be walking by and heard one of them ringing it was considered a courtesy to answer the call and attempt to find the student the caller was seeking. I called home, collect. 

 

“Granny is gone,” Mom said. 


I could say that Granny’s passing left a huge hole in my life, but that wouldn’t be entirely true. Because, now forty-five years later I can still see her face in my mind’s eye as clearly as if it were a photograph. It probably sounds trite, but I really do feel her with me. "Oh, you’re such a good boy." I  heard her say so many times.

Granny was born in 1880, when Rutherford B. Hayes was president of the United States. Her father fought in the Civil War. Through her stories, she connected me with a time long past, a time when automobiles had not yet been invented, when medical care was primitive, and many children (including her) were orphans because their parents died of diseases now rare or easily curable. She was extremely proud that she had finished the ninth grade. As arrogant as it may sound to say it, I knew that she adored me. 

To have been loved in such a manner was an immeasurable gift. 


~Brian Mc Donald

To subscribe to this Blog, type your email address in the box at the top right hand side of this page, hit 'submit' and follow the prompts. If you are viewing on a mobile device, click on the tab that says view web version and you will then see the box where you can enter your email address to subscribe. Thanks for following.







Sunday, May 19, 2019

Where Does America Find Genius?


For Generations, America has produced brilliant scientists, superb athletes, performers of all kinds, and thinkers that have significantly impacted world knowledge. How are we so lucky to have such individuals? How can we have more of them?

We are in the midst of a debate regarding immigration to this country. How should we best determine who is allowed to come?  On May 16, our president made a statement in the rose garden of the White House in which he outlined proposed changes to our immigration system.

Mr. Trump stated that the new system will be based on ‘merit.’  Preference will be given to people who are already financially self-sufficient, speak English, and possess high-level job skills.  On the surface, this seems logical and reasonable.  But, the more Mr. Trump talked, the more troubling became his message.

For generations, America has been a place where individuals who may have come from unfortunate circumstances can reach their potential and have a good life.   All that is required is that they are willing to work hard. Mr. Trump is saying that we should prioritize those who have already reached their potential to a significant degree before applying to come to this country. 

“Under the senseless rules of the current system, we’re not able to give preference to a doctor, a researcher, a student who graduated number one in his class from the finest colleges in the world .  .  .  .  If somebody graduates top of their class from the best college, sorry, go back to your country.”  Donald Trump, May 16, 1019. 

First of all, this is completely false. When an individual who completes a degree in the U.S. is asked by a company to stay because the expertise he/she possesses is needed, the company can apply for a green card for that person to remain and work in the U.S. I live in the Washington DC area and I meet such individuals frequently. 

But, President Trump went on to say something that stunned me. Regarding our current immigration system, he stated, “We discriminate against genius.  We discriminate against brilliance.”  Think about that. He is saying that by giving a chance to people from war-torn and poverty stricken countries, or countries with little educational opportunity, we are discriminating against genius. What?  Does he mean that among individuals fleeing violence in their home country there is no potential for genius? Does he mean that for individuals clinging to a rubber raft trying to cross an ocean to get to a better life, there is no possibility of brilliance?  

Trump stated, “The millions of legal immigrants who have come to America over the past half century are now cherished members of our national family.”  Well said!  Question; would these individuals have made it in under this ‘merit’ system?  I’m afraid many would not.  I happen to know many individuals whose parents or grandparents came to the U.S. without knowing a word of English, possessing only the clothes on their backs, and just enough money to last a few weeks.  These individuals didn’t have a degree from a fine university or a high-dollar skill. What they did possess was courage and determination! Consequently, they often took the most menial jobs; washing clothes, cleaning houses, working in the kitchens of restaurants 80 hours per week. But their children went to college and have become productive members of society. I know many of these individuals and so do you. I have nothing but the deepest admiration for individuals who set off for another land to find a better life, not knowing if they would ever see their loved ones again. These are the character traits that have made America great.  

Of course, America cannot admit every person wishing to immigrate. In an attempt to be fair to the scores of individuals hoping to immigrate to America, our current system employs a lottery system to select from the many coming from war-torn, poverty stricken, or politically oppressive countries. Mr. Trump stated that this current system is “contrary to American values.”  In fact, opening our door only to those potential immigrants who are already fortunate enough to be well educated is contrary to American values! 

I find distasteful the suggestion that among individuals willing to walk a thousand miles in order to find a better life, there is no possibility of genius or brilliance.  Rather than attempting to screen out from immigration all but those who already possess money, English ability, and high-demand skills, let’s continue to strive to make America a place where every individual’s yet-undiscovered brilliance can be recognized and cultivated. 

~Brian Mc Donald

To subscribe to this Blog, type your email address in the box at the top right hand side of this page, hit 'submit' and follow the prompts. If you are viewing on a mobile device, click on the tab that says view web version and you will then see the box where you can enter your email address to subscribe. Thanks for following.



Sunday, November 25, 2018

Why am I not in Prison?




From time to time when traveling through an area that I have not previously visited, I have observed a walled structure and noticed the telltale characteristics of a prison; walls topped with razor wire, stark angular buildings, a few narrow windows, a guard tower. Whenever I see a prison I find myself sinking into somber thoughts. People are locked behind these walls not unlike like animals confined and fed but not allowed freedom to live and move as they please.  As I go about my life pursuing my desires and enjoying my life, the thought of individuals confined away out of sight, day after day, year after year, is disturbing.  

At such times the thought arises in me, “Why am I not in prison?”  Many would respond that if you don’t violate society’s laws, then you have no worries about landing in prison.  I suppose this is, in a strict sense, true.  But it is also a fact that if you are unfortunate enough to be born poor, your chances of ending up in prison are greatly increased. Those who are members of particular racial/ethnic groups will more likely find themselves in prison. If you suffer from mental illness, the chances of being incarcerated are much higher. 

Why am I not in prison? True, I have not committed certain crimes that could land someone in prison. But, why have I not committed such crimes?  Frankly I was born into and have lived in life circumstances such that opportunities to commit most crimes have never presented themselves to me. I have never had to engage in physical violence to save my life or family members’ lives.  I wouldn’t know how to go about buying illegal drugs even if I wanted to.  I have never found myself among friends who decided to rob someone.  Nor, have I ever found myself lacking basic life provisions such that stealing was a realistic option. 


It has been said that in the U.S. we use prisons to house our poor and mentally ill.   An examination of the demographics of the prison population would substantiate this. Those who can afford competent legal representation (often middle/upper class and White) can usually secure a lighter sentence and thus little or no jail time. Their poor, often non-white counterparts who are guilty of the same crimes more often find themselves behind bars. 


Societies tend to want to deal with ‘criminals’ by throwing them in jail and forgetting about them. But, each person behind those walls is someone’s father or mother, son or daughter, sister or brother. It could have been me.  Of course, society needs to be protected from some individuals, but how many of these incarcerated people fit into this category?  Throughout history, prisons have been populated by individuals who are there largely because of the station of life into which they were born.  This is no less true today.  

In a famous biblical passage about end of life judgement, Jesus, referring to society’s most marginalized people said, “I was in prison and you did not visit me.” If there is a way to slow the flow of individuals into prison, that would be the noblest of goals.  If there is a way to give such individuals a second chance, that may be the mark of a truly great country. 

~Brian McDonald

To subscribe to this Blog, type your email address in the box at the top right hand side of this page, hit 'submit' and follow the prompts. If you are viewing on a mobile device, click on the tab that says view web version and you will then see the box where you can enter your email address to subscribe. Thanks for following.

Saturday, September 30, 2017

Packing "Heat" and the Bible


Many years ago when I was a foreign missionary, I took part in a conference of evangelical missionaries that were working in various countries around the world. One missionary lived and worked in a third-world country where there was a lot of lawlessness.  He shared that because of the violence in that society, most citizens carried a gun for protection.  He went on to say that he refused to carry a gun.  He felt that for him to carry a gun was a contradiction of his message that God is capable of protecting a person. He was known as 'the missionary who would not carry a gun."

Roy Moore, who recently prevailed in the U.S. Senate Republican primary run off in Alabama has been enthusiastically endorsed by many evangelical Christians because he vows to restore America to 'God's Law.'  He is best known for refusing to remove a monument of the ten commandments from the lawn of the courthouse where he served as judge and for defying the supreme court ruling that to deny a marriage license to same-sex couples is unconstitutional.

Recently at a campaign rally, Senate candidate Moore pulled a pistol from his pocket to the raucous delight of his audience of supporters.  In one breath he vowed to bring America back under God's law and in the next affirmed his support for gun ownership by brandishing a shiny pistol.  To assert that one supports the right of citizens to own a firearm is one thing, but to wave a pistol during a campaign speech is quite another.

I will say that I was not surprised by this but I was somewhat shocked. The increasing enthusiasm for these two things, bringing America back God and promoting firearms, in the same conversation is disturbing.  The history of combining religious zeal and weapons is a sad and tragic one.  

Evangelical Christians profess to adhere to certain beliefs that seem to be contradicted by promoting the carrying of a .gun for protection:

1) God will protect them.
2) Nothing can happen to a believer unless God permits it.
3) There is an appointed time for each person to die and one cannot alter this.

If one truly believes that God can and will protect them, why would one need to carry a gun? I would have more respect if such an individual said, "I know I am supposed to trust God to protect me, but I just can't,  so I carry a gun to protect myself."  Or, "I know that God would have to permit something happening to me, but I am afraid he will,  so I want to try to prevent it."

The wedding of conservative evangelicalism and gun enthusiasm is well established in current politics. Internet memes that show a gun and a bible and suggest that one should use both are common.  I dare say that 35-40 years ago, such a pairing would have been viewed as peculiar at best. As an Alabama native, I am deeply concerned about evangelicalism's embrace of Roy Moore (see my February 2015 post).  Brandishing a gun at a campaign rally only heightens this concern.

To subscribe to this Blog, type your email address in the box at the top right hand side of this page, hit 'submit' and follow the prompts. If you are viewing on a mobile device, click on the tab that says view web version and you will then see the box where you can enter your email address to subscribe. Thanks for following.

Saturday, July 8, 2017

Teeth for Everyone!

It came in the mail just a few days ago. The deceptively attractive postcard reminding me that it is time for my dental checkup.  Ugh.  I admit I often put this off until something in my mouth is bothering me.  Like many people my mouth is full of fillings, crowns, and root canals.  Last year a tooth had to be pulled and the dentist asked if I wanted an implant.  Since it was one of the very back teeth, I could not tell much difference without it so I passed on that. If they ever have to identify me by my dental records they will have plenty to work with.


Recently, I was visiting a sports venue in Baltimore, Maryland.  It was the sight of the “Preakness” horse race. This had been on mine and my wife’s bucket list so we decided to don colorful hats and take in the festivities just once.  Like many large sports venues, Pimlico Race Course is in an economically impoverished part of town.  As we entered the neighborhood where the course is located, there were decaying homes on either side of the road. Residents were attempting to make some money by offering for you to park in their front yard or by selling some food that they had prepared. 

As we inched along I couldn’t help but notice two residents who were selling bottled water. These individuals appeared to be in their 40’s.  The thing that caught my attention was that neither of these individuals had any teeth.  As I looked around I saw others who, if not completely toothless, had large gaps or maybe just a few teeth. The question arose in my mind, “Why is it that poor people don’t get to have teeth?”

Personally, I cannot attribute my mouth full of teeth to my great dental care habits. Yes, I brush every morning but that is about it.  When the dental hygienist reminds me to floss at least once per day, I smile sheepishly hoping I won’t have to admit that I haven’t flossed since my last visit. A man in my office suite can be seen in the restroom brushing his teeth after lunch each day with an electric toothbrush!  I took a toothbrush to keep in my desk, but it is almost petrified for lack of use. Yet, I can still enjoy chewing meat, eating corn on the cob, and even nuts when I want.

Shouldn’t the ability to chew and thus eat be something that we as a nation would want to strive to provide for every citizen?  If there are basic needs, this is surely one of them.  I happen to have had parents who took me to the dentist even though I protested vehemently.  For so many this is not really an option.  Dental care in America has become a luxury that is often not covered even by ‘pretty good’ health plans. I once had a friend who tried gluing his broken crown back on using Super Glue because he couldn’t afford the visit to the dentist. If people with good jobs have difficulty having their teeth repaired, how can low-income or poor individuals hope to avoid the pain, suffering, and yes, humiliation of having few or no teeth? By the way, the overwhelming majority of such individuals do work and provide services that are essential for our society to function.

When it comes to government efforts to provide for the basic needs of the less fortunate, it is not uncommon to hear a remark like, “Why should I have to pay for this or that for someone else?”  For me, it is not about what we should do. Rather it is about what we want to do.  What kind of country do we want to have? The sad fact is that in a capitalist society, there will be some individuals who fill necessary roles, but who actually make very little money.  How do we want to treat these individuals? I want my country to be a place that wants every person to be able to have teeth!

To subscribe to this Blog, type your email address in the box at the top right hand side of this page, hit 'submit' and follow the prompts. If you are viewing on a mobile device, click on the tab that says view web version and you will then see the box where you can enter your email address to subscribe. Thanks for following.

Tuesday, April 4, 2017

Is Abortion Murder?


American society continues to be divided over the issue of abortion and there doesn’t appear to be any truce in sight. For those who oppose abortion the possibility of a supreme court justice that will tilt the court toward outlawing abortion has defined their choice of a president.   Following the November, 2016 presidential election, exit polls showed astonishingly that 76% of voters who self-described as “evangelical” voted for Donald Trump.  It appears that the deciding factor for many, if not most of such voters was that Mr. Trump promised to appointment a supreme court justice who would enable the supreme court to overthrow Roe vs. Wade, the 1973 landmark decision that legalized abortion.  As I write this, senate Republicans and Democrats are battling the confirmation of Mr. Trump’s nominee to fill the vacant seat on the supreme court.

Abortion opponents insist that abortion is murder.  For many that hold this view there can be no dialogue about the matter. Yes, abortion is a serious matter and should not be considered lightly.  But I am willing to argue that whether or not this is ‘murder’ can be debated with valid points on either side.  As early as the 1940’s and 50’s, even many conservative Christian scholars and clergy did not view abortion as something to be forbidden under any circumstance.  Abortion opponents insist that human life begins at conception and to terminate a pregnancy after this point is murder.  But, this is a relatively recent view. Historically, there have been various views regarding when a human life begins. Many believe life begins at birth, others assert it is when a heartbeat or brain activity can be detected.  Still others state that life begins when the fetus could be viable outside the womb.  

The issue of abortion is not addressed in the Bible, contrary to what many people insist.  The only case in scripture of something analogous to abortion is the case, addressed by Jewish law, where an individual strikes a pregnant woman with the result that she miscarries.  The Jewish law specifies a punishment for such an act, but it is not the same punishment as for murder. As far as the commandment, “Thou shall not kill,” there has been historical disagreement as to the application of this in several areas.  For example, does this forbid a person from fighting in a war for his/her country? Does this preclude capital punishment? These are questions that are not easily answered.

As I have struggled with this in my own mind over the years, several considerations have led to my refraining from viewing someone who chooses an abortion as a ‘murderer.’  It appears to me that to make it a criminal act for a woman to terminate a pregnancy is in essence forcing a woman to have child, even if she is unable to care for a child, or has no one to help her rear the child.  While adoption is a wonderful act,  I don’t see society being willing to take up this responsibility on a large scale.

The life of a mother and her potential offspring cannot be viewed separately.  In the animal kingdom, offspring become self-sufficient almost immediately at birth.  A giraffe can stand shortly after emergence from the womb and actually begin running within an hour or two.  Guppies give birth to tiny babies who swim off immediately to fend for themselves.  Humans, on the other hand are helpless at birth and this doesn’t change quickly.  Parents know that it takes upwards of 20 years for that child to become a self-sufficient adult. America has an incarceration rate higher that any industrialized nation.  At the risk of over generalization, our jails and prisons are full of individuals that were not adequately prepared by anyone to become productive members of society.

An egg and sperm come together and form a cluster of cells that we call, in layman’s terms, a ‘fertilized egg.’ While some assert that this is the beginning of life, one could make the argument that there is life even before this fertilized egg.  After all a viable egg and a sperm that can swim are ‘alive’ in some sense.  So why insist that after they meet it is immediately ‘murder’ to prevent this from developing into a person?

Further, to say that to terminate this cluster of cells is murder is essentially saying that it must be allowed to become a person regardless of whether there is anyone capable or willing to care for this life physically, emotionally, socially, and educationally.  What astounds me is that the voting block for whom opposition to abortion is the singular issue that determines their vote seems to be, for the most part, the same block that opposes expansion of welfare programs, meals for the poor, better pay for public school teachers, education to prevent unwanted pregnancy, etc.  It appears to be the same group that favors ever tougher laws and the building of more prisons to house the people who break these laws.

Does it not seem logical that the same people who say that every fertilized egg is a life which must be preserved would also be the biggest proponents of a systematic program to help these eggs become lives that are worth living? There is great outrage and protest at the performing of abortions at health clinics, but this rings rather hollow when there is nothing like the same outrage expressed about the conditions in which children live in inner cities or poor rural areas of the country. I would respect abortion opponents more if they put forth even half the effort to help children born into poverty as they put into protesting abortion.

Abortion is a serious matter. Personally, I have not had to grapple with such a decision.  But, I have sat with individuals who have and it is an incredibly difficult decision.  But it doesn’t seem to me that this is something that should be decided by the making of laws.   I respect those who oppose abortion and they have every right to promote their view and discourage people from having abortions as long as this is done in a non-intrusive, non-forceful manner.

For some who will read this, what I have said is ‘anathema.’  They are not likely to change their minds.  I also realize that some people will decide that I am one of the bad guys in this debate.  But, in the interest of civility, tolerance, and a path forward in our society, perhaps some reading this will broaden their view of this matter even slightly, and thus bring greater understanding among us all. 

To subscribe to this Blog, type your email address in the box at the top right hand side of this page, hit 'submit' and follow the prompts. If you are viewing on a mobile device, click on the tab that says view web version and you will then see the box where you can enter your email address to subscribe. Thanks for following.